Los Angeles Film Festival 2010

The Los Angeles Film Festival is taking place at this very moment, running concurently with our very own Edinburgh International Film Festival. We’re lucky enough to have a review for a film screening there, one which is news to me and certainly looks worth a watch, particularly as it’s an adaptation of one of my favourite authors works, the great Gabriel Garcia Marquez. For more similar reviews take a look at: http://forgottenclassicsofyesteryear.blogspot.com/

Of Love and Other Demons
Directed by Hilda Hidalgo
Rating: 3 out of 4 stars

The characters in Hilda Hidalgo’s adaptation of the classic novel Of Love and Other Demons by Gabriel García Márquez inhabit a world of striking boundaries. Located on the tiny island of Costa Rica, there is a sharp distinction between that which is right and modern and that which is ancient and evil. The most beautiful building on the island is the seat of the Catholic Church, headed by a plump bishop who bemoans how the natives reject the Church for their old pagan religions. He presides over a land where the only white people are the nobility and the upper echelons of the faith. The natives are forced to live in poorer quarters where they can easily escape the view of the Cross and practice their old traditions. In this land, the tenuous balance between the two ways of life is fragile. Therefore, it is made even more devastating when two lovers find themselves trapped between the two parts of society. It all begins when 13 year old Sierva María, a child of high nobility, is bitten by a rabid dog one morning in the marketplace. Terrified for her health, her father enlists the help of the Church who claim that she does not harbor an infection, but instead is possessed by demons. So she is locked away in the basement of a small convent where she is tied down to her bed as she wastes away. Convinced that she is not sick but possessed by Satan, the local bishop sends his assistant, 36 year old Cayetano Delaura, to be in charge of her welfare. A man of letters, Cayetano realizes that she is not possessed but merely sick. But the bishop will hear nothing of it, so he continues his watch over Sierva until she begins to invade his dreams. As a man of faith, he cannot touch her. But as a man of science, he cannot abandon her. Herein lies the great conflict within the film. As Cayetano realizes that he is falling in love with Sierva, he has to make a choice between his faith and his heart. The story may sound like a rehash of the classic Romeo and Juliet story archetype wherein two people fall in love only to be separated by some controlling force. But it is much more. Instead of blind love, each lover is confronted with challenges that redefine how they see the world and each other. Sierva finds herself trapped between two opposite worlds. Her “caretakers” represent blind faith as the nuns who attend her merely cross themselves when she throws up instead of trying to heal her. But one day a fellow captive sneaks into her cell to keep her company. This woman represents a complete lack of faith as she expounds humanist sayings such as how when we die, we cease to exist and how there is no God. Cayetano represents a median between the two extremes. A devout Catholic, he believes in possessions and the devil, but is hesitant to diagnose her as possessed. Constantly with his nose in a book, Cayetano dreams of one day working in the Vatican library. So he surrounds himself with knowledge that the Church finds questionable. But Cayetano also finds himself in a state of confliction. His master is brunt and unreasonable, but he cannot challenge his authority. He needs to be with Sierva, but realizes that doing so may damn his soul. So we watch how the two lovers develop and how their feelings grow. In the furtive moments that they spend together in her cell, their passions are revealed, but suppressed. Watching their body language is a sensual delight, as a single caress becomes symbolic of a full consummation of love. And really, Of Love and Other Demons is a film obsessed with such caresses. The cinematography constructs a world of evocative pastels and subdued hues. The brightest colors come in the form of the small insects and lizards that Sierva plays with. The soundtrack is filled with soft, gentle melodies that echo the lullabies that nannies croon to cranky, tired children. The director, Hilda Hidalgo, controls the pacing with a smooth, gentle touch. The film is consumed by striking close-ups that seem to regard Sierva’s face and long crimson hair and Cayetano’s constantly worried profile as a kind of fetish. It is a slow moving, delicately streaming film that plays like a poem or a passage of Márquez’s prose.

Dennis Hopper – a life in film

One day back in the early 60’s, Dennis Hopper and Peter Fonda dropped into film producer Bert Schneider’s office. Hardly dressed for the occasion in dirty denims they proceeded to ask for finance for a suicidal and slanderous project on the assassination of JFK. Schneider was a bit of a renegade in the industry but even this was a step too far for him. He did however enquire about the progress of their biker movie, at this time named The Loners. When informed by Hopper that current studio “AIP is just dickin’ around man,” he agreed to take it up. At this point nobody could have understood what was on the horizon, a high watermark for US cinema and a rebellious, frightening message from the counter culture to mainstream apple pie America. This was the film which became Easy Rider.

“Nobody had ever seen themselves portrayed in a movie. At every love-in across the country people were smoking grass and dropping LSD, while audiences were still watching Doris Day and Rock Hudson!”
Dennis Hopper

The extremely sad news came through on the 29th May this year that Dennis Hopper had died from prostate cancer. This all too common killer brought the curtain down on the life of a seriously uncommon man. The 1970’s saw a sea change in the output of American cinema, a coup de tat of the Hollywood power players. A film school generation took control and created a seesaw of mainstream blockbusters of unseen popularity and creative and violent counters to these such as Bonnie & Clyde. Hopper was a key architect of this revolution. Perhaps architect is the wrong term, it implies careful thought and planning, a measured mind. Dennis was the antithesis to this, a white hot, drug frazzled creator and antagoniser. Nonetheless, his role in the construction of the new Hollywood was pivotal, so let’s pay tribute to him with this stroll through some of his most famous appearances.

Most remember Hopper for his 60’s and 70’s heyday, a figurehead for the turn on, tune in, drop out generation. What many are unaware of is the genesis of his career. The belief that this mysterious outsider rode straight onto cinema screens on his teardrop chopper is a false one. Hopper worked and trained hard, long before the culture Easy Rider reflected was even imagined. His skills were honed in the famous Actors Studio where Marlon Brando, Jimmy Dean and the like studied through the tutelage of Lee Strasberg. Hopper befriended Dean and co-starred in three of his pictures, admittedly not to great note or fanfare. He idolised Dean and his premature death destroyed him. He also starred in a number of westerns, even alongside John Wayne. His counter culture credentials may not have been explicit then but they were germinating. At one point he managed to get that limping champion of right wing rednecks ‘The Duke’ to march gun in hand threatening to kill him. Here he is in his first movie with a title which he eventually wore a lot more comfortably than the lead, Rebel Without a Cause.

Like most icons Hoppers main characterising moment came early. Like a junkie forever chasing his first hit he was destined never to reach those same heights. The aforementioned Easy Rider defined Dennis Hopper. Dennis wrote, directed (Peter Fonda disagrees to an extent) and starred in this epoch forming 1969 road movie which broke all the rules. Quite apart from showing a culture and lifestyle which was deemed unacceptable, Hoppers techniques were also dismissed offhand. Beautiful shots of sunlight creating rainbow arcs in the camera lens were thought to be amateur mistakes caused by the lack of filters. These opinions coming from professionals who had surely never dabbled with hallucinogenics. The shocking and violent ending to the movie was a mirror to the treatment dealt out to those unwilling to conform in 1960’s America.

Jump forward a decade to 1979 and we find Dennis in his next noted role, one so iconic it was parodied by the Muppets. Months in the jungle filming Apocalypse Now left Francis Ford Coppola a crazed and broken man. His famous quote reads “We had access to too much money, too much equipment, and little by little, we went insane.” This insanity could not have been helped by the arrival of Dennis Hopper, playing an unnamed photojournalist. His lines lie somewhere between cryptic mysticism and mad inane ramblings but make for a truly memorable performance. The relationship between his and Brando’s onscreen characters reflected the reality of their feelings towards each other.

Now, it’s never good etiquette to speak ill of the dead but Hopper starred in a whole sackful of stinkers, partly because like Bowie he was willing to experiment, partly because like David Beckham he would often happy to whore himself out for cold hard cash. Super Mario Brothers springs to mind instantly. But I’m no film snob, I’m a lover of cult trash and they don’t come much trashier than the batshit crazy Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2.

In his autumn years he found his second calling, playing the bad guy. These roles perhaps became the stereotype, but stereotypes normally arise from a performance so great it’s impossible to look past it. For Hopper this was in the film which rescued him from a creative wilderness, David Lynch’s 1986 classic Blue Velvet. The film as a whole (like many of Lynch’s) is horribly unnerving but nothing can prepare us for the entrance of the character Frank Booth, the gas sniffing psychotic killer who needs his mommy. He’s magnetic and repellent at the same time, like stealing a glimpse at a particularly distasteful accident and later wishing you never. It’s a rare actor who can achieve this, and that’s why the man is such a loss.

There were many sides to Hopper, some violent and disagreeable. There are many tales of him, some hilarious, others unpleasant. Drugs and guns featured frequently. I’m sure he has few regrets though. My only small one is that he never took the role offered to him in Repo Man, he would have fitted perfectly. What can never be denied though is the man’s creative output. A keen and fairly successful photographer in later life, a writer, actor and on a couple of occasions a fine director. Surely his best film outwith Easy Rider being the LA gang drama Colors. A film which has dated poorly next to the fresher, harsher and more authentic work of John Singleton and the Hughes brothers, but nonetheless a well made, finely cast enjoyable film.

So, Hopper is a man who will be sorely missed. The current term de jour is ‘a game changer’ and in his respect this is surely true. He may not have been one of the most pressing forces behind Hollywood’s change but he was an instigator and a catalyst. Without him who knows where American film would be today. I’ll leave you with one of his finest performances, playing a victim for once alongside a wolfish Christopher Walken in True Romance. Seeing these two distinctive masters size each other up on screen is a total joy.

Retro Review – two sides of the same coin

Reviews of:

Kuroneko
Onibaba

Great filmmakers often have themes central to their body of work and revisit them constantly. I’ve talked previously of Herzog and his obsession with obsession and revenge is a key ingredient of the Korean films discussed previously. Michael Haneke was either audacious or supremely arrogant to remake his provocative study on modern day voyeurship of violence, Funny Games. It was my considering of the rights and wrongs of this old provocateur which turned my mind to a man who made two films so identical in plot but light years apart in style and tone.

A saurai is lured to his death in Kuroneko

Kaneto Shindo is one of Japan’s most prolific filmmakers, a man known as much for his screenwriting prowess as for his skills in direction. His long career paired him alongside some of the country’s finest directors including Seijun Suzuki and Hiroshi Teshigahara, maker of the phenomenal Woman of the Dunes. His skills have been fertiliser to the creative work of these others, allowing their productions to flourish. Shindo however is a force of his own and has produced films of intense atmosphere and outstanding beautiful visuals. 1960’s The Naked Island gave the world an insight into Japanese rural life showing islanders as ants struggling with and against nature. His two masterpieces however came later, in 1964 and 1968 and are Onibaba and Kuroneko respectively.

The mother and daughter team dispose of some bodies in Onibaba

Folklore is an important element of Japanese life and is so often communicated through art, film being one well used channel. This traditional blend of Chinese demonology and Indian spiritualism has been popular throughout their cinematic history. These supernatural films even have their own genre, Kaidan. The word is even used in the titles of these movies, the Japanese title of Blind Woman’s Curse being a prime example. It’s a label allowing the audience to realise exactly what they’re getting into. Another genre is Jidai Geki which is a term for samurai related historical pieces. Shindo combined these film types for both Kuroneko and Onibaba to great effect. These films are like brother and sister, a narrative description makes them seem almost identical but it’s mood which separates the two. Shindo has given us two historical tales of revenge, both perpetrated by mother daughter teams. These women have a deserved grudge against a male dominated world which has wronged them.

Black Cats

One key difference is that in Onibaba our women are alive and well, a pair living a simple existence in a war torn world. In Kuroneko they die in the opening scene. For the remainder of the film they are ghosts, spirits returned to wreak vengeance on all samurai as payback for the fact they were raped and killed by these very men. These spirits lure men to their death with the promise of food drink and perhaps a little bit of slap and tickle. But it’s a different type of pussy they get as the women have become cat spirits and kill the men as a kitty would a mouse. The cat theme is often prominent in Japanese horror, there’s even a name for it as well, kaibyo meaning cat ghost. This brings me back to Blind Woman’s Curse (another 1960’s horror which is certainly worth tracking down)where a black cat torments poor Meiko Kaji as a harbinger of death. In Kuroneko the women themselves become cat demons and this is beautifully realised in particularly subtle and creative ways. The daughters ponytail flicks on its own accord as a cat’s tail would, she is also nimble and skips over water with feline grace. The mother laps from a water bowl and at one point her hand becomes a cat’s paw. It’s quite surreal and sounds ridiculous but Shindo handles it with such aesthetic grace that everything works perfectly. The first murder scene is a stylistic triumph. Traditional Japanese drum music builds in the background while the mother performs a gradually intensifying kabuki dance. The tension grows until the daughter pounces in deadly fashion. It’s a stunning piece of cinema.

The ladies of Onibaba hold less grace. They live simple, almost animalistic lives, farming and hunting. Passing samurai going to and from war are tricked and killed, their armour and weapons sold for profit, their bodies thrown into an ominous black hole. A male neighbour plunges their relationship into jealousy and turmoil. The younger couple have a feverish desire for each other while the mother fears her daughters desertion and a future alone. She requires the others help to murder the samurai and therefore needs her just to simply survive. Onibaba is not a supernatural tale but the fear of ghosts and spectres becomes an intrinsic part of the plot. Jealousy manifests itself through a demonic hoax which plays on the guilt felt by the daughter at her affair with the rougish neighbour. This ‘two’s company, three’s a crowd’ scenario is common in film (handled with most skill recently in Asif Kapadia’s eerily beautiful Far North, with the ever amazing Michelle Yeoh) but Shindo truly manages to uncover the base emotions feeding the drama. Fear, lust, jealousy and hate are displayed visually, and it is these visuals in both films which combines them and at the same time separates.

Setting the Scene

internal demons in Onibaba

Onibaba takes place in a huge marsh of swaying reeds. This becomes a motif for the film, an indicator of the mood. Kuroneko trades these reeds in for a bamboo forest. Both are equally stunning settings and allow me to go all film school wanker by mentioning mise en scene. This theory relates to telling a story visually, creating a mood and a character which conveys meaning to the viewer. Shindo handles this majestically. Both films are worth watching for the photography alone, each black and white frame is an exquisite construction. I’ve added the trailers for both films at the bottom as proof of theor visual perfection. In many ways Kuroneko is a delicate graceful film, feline like the ghosts cats which inhabit it. It knows its protocol, uses the right cutlery and says the right things. Onibaba on the other hand has no need for manners. It’s hot and sweaty, its characters constantly unrobed, crude and animal. Instinct is followed rather than etiquette. The power of this mise en scene is such that we watch these two close stories but take away such different elements from each. Some directors make a wide range of films but each one has their same watermark, they say the same thing in the same voice. Shindo pulled of a masterstroke by recycling the narrative while telling two independent stories through mood and imagery. It’s not a case of style over substance, in these instances the style is the substance.

Six of the Best – Revenge

This week let’s dust of the pliers and blowtorch to go medieval on scenes of revenge. Please agree, disagree and add your suggestions at the bottom.

Is there anything more gratifying than a good revenge flick? Whether eaten cold, as the Spanish suggest, hot, al dente or with fava beans and a nice Chianti, it is certainly a satisfying dish. Partly it’s the investment involved; we agree to endure over an hour of pain and suffering along with our protagonist purely for the momentary satisfaction of the brutal final reel.

Continue reading ‘Six of the Best – Revenge’

Red Corner/Blue Corner – Solaris v Solaris

This regular feature puts original films in the ring against their remakes and lets them slug it out over 5 rounds. Feel free to disagree with the ref’s decision and leave your comments at the end.

They say that imitation is the highest form of flattery. If that’s the case than Stephen Soderburgh has a bit of a crush on Andrei Tarkovsky. In the world of cinema I’m sure he’s not alone in feeling this way. Tarkovsky is a giant of the arts. This series is called Red Corner/Blue corner so I may as well start with the boxing similes early, Tarkovsky is a true heavyweight filmmaker. I felt almost bad putting Soderburgh up against him here, like a referee with blood on his hands who feels responsibility for a death in the ring. But sometimes underdogs win, so let’s put their respective films head to head and see how they fare.

Continue reading ‘Red Corner/Blue Corner – Solaris v Solaris’

News – The Auteurs

Auteur theory in film….wait, please don’t go, I won’t bore you with that. I’ll just get straight to it and tell you about a wonderful website which offers free movies, a perfect and natural home for film fans. I stumbled upon this a while back and a commenter also posted a link on an earlier cinematheque post.

The Auteurs is an extensive online movie database where films can be viewed on your home computer or laptop. Admittedly most movies have a charge but there are a number which are possible to view for free and these change regularly. Initial sign up costs nothing, if you want to pay to watch any particular movies after that then that’s up to you.

http://www.theauteurs.com/

What I found amazing when I first stumbled upon this site is the range of films they have. They offer a cocktail of classics, cult, new directors and some absolute rarities I can’t imagine finding elsewhere. Even the most ardent movie fan will find it an education. What does tie their titles together is the name of the site, The Auteurs. Now I’ll bore you.

Auteur is quite simply the French for author. When mentioned alongside film the term relates to a director with a very specific style either visually or thematically. This spans genres and there are noted auteurs like Mario Bava making horror movies alongside Truffaut’s supposedly higher class art house films.

Francois Truffaut - the man who coined the phrase

The term seems overused these days and especially caught the public attention when last year’s Cannes festival was christened the battle of the auteurs with Jacques Audiard and Michael Haneke went head to head for the Palm D’or. The term is certainly no mark of quality, an auteur can employ their recurring aesthetics and themes to produce consistently abysmal or reliably dull pieces. On the other hand Clint Eastwood would never be regarded as one but remains a master filmmaker. Style is not always relevant to spinning a good yarn onscreen. Often though autuers are directors with vision and their works are both unique and creative.

The Auteurs is a site worth checking out to re-explore your favourite classics or discover a new name in the arena of world cinema. Why not start with Antonioni and work your way through to Zebrianus.

Article – Cinema Below the 39th Parallel

The phrase ‘golden era’ was originally coined in relation to film as a label for 1930’s Hollywood, a time when anything seemed possible and megalomaniac producers mobilised their harems of stars to appear in some of cinema’s all time classics.

Since then many countries film industries have experienced their own mini eras of success and creativity. Post war Japan was a reflective time for the country and developed true masters such as Kurosawa, Mizoguchi and of course Ozu. The French new wave of the 60’s was a particularly strong period for a consistent producer of quality artistic films, before the baton was returned to the USA in the 1970’s, as the film school generation of Coppola, Scorsese and Lucas stretched their wings. In my book, Hong Kong cinema reached a cultural peak in the 90’s, an opinion I’m happy to bore people with on a daily basis. Yet a different Asian location has been growing in confidence and now has bragging rights as home to some of the most interesting, inventive and shocking cinema of the last decade. That country is South Korea.

Continue reading ‘Article – Cinema Below the 39th Parallel’

Six of the Best – Moral Panic!

Let’s peer through the horn rimmed specs of Mary Whitehouse and ‘think of the children!’ as we look at six films which created crises of morality in their day. Please add to the panic with your own suggestions at the bottom.

Our current vision of news may be obscured by a blizzard of mephedrone, but if we can strap on our goggles and look back at headlines from years gone by we’d find that every moment has its panic whether it be sex, drugs or rock and roll (in the best cases all three). What’s permanently a given is that this outrage always links to morality and its seemingly continual disintegration.

Continue reading ‘Six of the Best – Moral Panic!’

Article – Obsessed with Obsession

One of cinemas most extraordinary directors and bewildering characters is one Werner Herzog. This is a man thankfully still working today in an industry which is all too often unable to provoke or excite its audience. The only horizon of expectation attached to Herzog is to expect the unexpected for his films know no genre styling or format. He is as au fait with documentary as he is with historical drama or modern pulp fiction. However one theme sticks to his work both in front and behind the camera, and that is obsession.

It was 1972 when the 30 year old German filmmaker travelled to Peru to film his first feature. Most aspiring directors make their debut in their backyard covering a subject matter familiar to them, not Herzog. 16th Century conquistadors seemed like a good start for him so he packed his bags, his camera and his psychotic leading man/childhood friend and departed for Machu Picchu. The initial frames of Aguirre Wrath of God depicting Spanish soldiers and Peruvian natives scaling the misty slopes of that awesome and ancient monolith is truly one of cinemas greatest visual moments. What followed is a story of madness and obsession on both sides of the lens. On screen a search for El Dorado the mythical city of gold, behind it Werner Herzog and Klaus Kinski sought a different treasure, a modern cinematic masterpiece. Kinski played the deluded monkey wielding conqueror as only he could. The manic reality of Klaus Kinski is more captivating than any performance. The charismatic but ever so slightly temperamental actor found time to anger the locals with his explosive outbursts and prima donna demands. This behaviour would only increase through the years until 1982 when the indigenous extras on the again Peruvian set of Fitzcarraldo asked Herzog if he would like them to kill Kinski. The director mused it over but decided that a living lead man was necessary to complete his film.

Continue reading ‘Article – Obsessed with Obsession’

Six of the best – Scotland on film

In homage to this blogs Scottish roots and link to the Leither Magazine (link on the right) lets raise our glasses of whisky and say slaand jivaa to the best genuine representations of Scotland on the silver screen.

Walter Scott is not the only one responsible for wrapping us Caledonians in tartan and force feeding us haggis. True, the propaganda drive originated with him but we have embraced it. This fictitious reality has been our saint but has also sinned against us. Tourists flock to this beautiful country each year in search of falsified folklore, reality as depicted on a shortbread tin. We know it’s a bit of a sham but we play the game because it’s fun and it’s profitable. But for every William Wallace there’s a Groundskeeper Willie. Our stereotype stares at us in the mirror as we raise a glass to it and to self fulfilling prophecies.

Film and literature reflects this, as it does all aspects of life and culture. The representation of Scotland on screen has too often followed the international consciousness of what the country is, of glen roaming and caber tossing. So, let’s look past that and think of more genuine slices of Scottish life, from kitchen sink reality to surreal dark humour. Let’s wander down from the picturesque mountains to street level at look at how we see ourselves rather than how others see us.

Continue reading ‘Six of the best – Scotland on film’




This is a Leither Magazine .com Blog